Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/10/2018 in all areas
-
4 pointsGlad to finally hear more about the game itself and not about all the rage storm around the announcment, thanks a lot for your impression and the interview ! Did they give you an online alpha/beta/demo time ?
-
3 pointsWell then, prot pala dont seem to be a high skillcap class ?
-
2 pointsDeadset gets his hands on Diablo: Immortal and an interview with the devs! With a world of mixed feelings surrounding the new Diablo announcement, our Diablo 3 guide writer, Deadset, got the chance to sit down with Wyatt Cheng and Joe Hsu for an interview, as well as spend time testing Diablo: Immortal. Check out what the developers had to say, as well as Deadset's thoughts on the announcement. Preface This past Blizzcon marks several ‘firsts’ for me. The first time I cross half the globe, from windy Eastern Europe to the unrelenting Californian sun. The first time I attend Bliz
-
2 points
-
2 pointsI know you're trying your best, but it still won't work for most people, myself included. Also, get ready to be called a shill for Blizzard.
-
1 pointWith all the talk about mobile gaming after this year's BlizzCon, it seems appropriate to take a look at some WoW handheld action as well! Redditor Farrailgun shared this Mythic Taloc fight from his Protection Paladin perspective, showing that we might one day be playing something as complex as WoW on mobile devices. He's playing on a GPD Win2, a mini handheld PC, and it's not being streamed to the device, but is actually running on it, as he clarified in the reddit thread itself. He also mentions he wouldn't run Mythic+ on it (unless he connects a separate mouse and keyboard),
-
1 pointIf this was the case, then it wouldn't be an interesting ability. It would just be another generic cooldown like summon demonic tyrant, but instead of casting it after you have a bunch of summons out, you cast it before. I like the current design because it actually forces you to change up your rotation when it's off CD, increasing the skill cap of demo locks (the class feels very easy as it stands).
-
1 point
-
1 pointYou literally just said "sadly this game is not meant for you" to an actual Diablo fan. Please don't contradict yourself. Debatable. Yes, it's meant to target a new audience. But at the same time, if you can excite your already established fan base (which is not small by any means, we both can agree) they can easily make more money off of both audiences. It's foolish to assume that this game was not targeting both existing and new audiences. Well no duh. As a company it was a logical move by all means. But the announcement within itself was sad and disappointing tow
-
1 pointTheir timing and presentation was shit, i agree with you. As i said before, i think diablo 4 was supposed to be announced. but it was too early in development. Blizzard usually makes high quality games. I wouldn't be surprised if immortal is better than any of the other copies, but it's not a guarantee. I'm just trying to explain their though process. Ask them why they think people would play their game over existing ones, not me. Why do you think blizzard owes you anything? That's a psychological tactic. They present themselves as your friends. Look at us, we are gamers too, we play
-
1 pointYeeah, you are missing one important thing though. Expanding to a new market is a good thing, but it requires a really proper timing. At least you have to be well established in your primary market where the majority of your consumers are. With no major advancement in this regard for several years now, and substantial competition from Korean devs on the horizon (Lost Ark, Project TL), Blizzard is in the risk of weakening their position there. Are you really sure, given all that, mobile Diablo is a good way to win new audience and eventually attract it to years old PC game? I'm not. Moreov
-
1 pointThe game sadly isn't meant for you. It's meant for the mobile players. The guys and gals that play casualy in their free time. And towards the asian market. This is supposed to be a hook for people who never tried diablo before to see what's it about. And a large part of that new player base will buy diablo 3 and thus blizzard expands their influence to even more people. Blizzard is a company, not your friend. They made diablo immortal for money and to expand in the newest marketplace: the mobile games. A mobile game from them would've been inevitable. It happened to be diablo and not starcraf
-
1 pointTo be fair, no one said diablo 4 will be announced. They even tried to shut down the hype (i admit, with a shit blog-post). They said they have multiple teams working on multiple projects, and that the diablo 4 team is separate from the immortal one. With the rumor of the video announcement that was supposed to be at the end of the panel and the fact that they said diablo 4 went through at least 2 iterations so far, i personally think they expected both games (4 and immortal) to be somewhat ready at the same time. They plan Blizzcons with months if not years in advance. But diablo 4 had a slow
-
1 pointWell of course he had extended time to test it. You can see from the pictures that there were only like, 10 people around the booth at all. No need to switch around often with such a low defree of interest in the game. And for the record, to those saying that the critique isn't valid from people who have not played it, you're wrong. I don't need to play D:I to know that nothing good would come from it. Be it dumbing down the game, the lack of blood, MTX, etc. I have several reasons to never touch it, especially since a superior game on the move is already here. D3 for the Switch, which is
-
1 pointThe huge majority who are """criticizing""" the game didn't even play or buy it. lol What's going on here isn't a matter of taking critiques or not, it's just about a bunch of people who didn't get what they were expecting for their favorite game franchise and now are bitching about it non-stop because they feel like a company and it's developers owe them something.
-
1 pointAll of my friends that went to Blizzcon said it was sick. The thing that will make or break it is the In-App-Purchases and/or initial purchase price. If you all want to miss out on something that is being reviewed as good just because it's not the type of ice cream you wanted, go for it. I plan to actually play it (price depending) and form my own opinion. If you played it at Blizzcon and still hate it, then sure you have way more value to your criticism. But it you're just sitting at home, hearing words about it, calling people opinions "paid lip-service", and flaming it endlessly you re
-
1 pointEveryone is a shill for doing a job, by that logic. It's pretty damn stupid. The population is so damn hateful. Instead of embracing something new they automatically hate it. I'm not saying it should be loved, but jesus, at least have an open mind about it (not you, the hateful playerbase).
-
1 pointI would rather mod my toaster ! (check from 3:53 there ? ) :
-
1 pointEarnings are gonna drop hard in the next quarter. RIP Diablo ?
-
1 pointYou forgot to mention the huge hatred of the Diablo fans towards Blizzard for all the overhype given
-
1 pointAfter playing 5 games with this basic deck at Rank 22, I think I can reply to my own questions above. First of all, with 4 victories for 1 defeat, I must admit that the deck is still running reasonably well, despite the weakening of Innervate. Secondly, I was wrong about Innervate. The 2 copies of that card, even weaker, have to stay in the deck, simply because it belongs to the deck concept. I was however correct when suspecting that the less efficient Innervate would require adjusting the rest of the deck. Prior to the change, you would ideally play Innervate and one of the 4-drop
-
1 pointEarly next year. The plan is to release 8.1 in December, but the raid will not be available immediately when Tides of Vengeance goes live.
-
1 pointYou know why I hate it already? Because I have Windows phone... and all 21 of us will never be able to even try it.... ? They could make one version for Windows Store, that way everyone would be covered... ?
-
1 point
-
Newsletter