PancakeMonk
-
Content Count
74 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
yes after playing the deck for quite some time couldn't agree enough with what you have stated ..thanks ^^)
-
totally agree specially for shado-pan rider ..for his cost in this deck strategy you are usually finishing the game and dont need more staying power and rather trying to find the burst damage to kill your opponent and for the undercity valiant he is a more expensive Flame Juggler with no point of extending for a combo while you are looking for board dominance ..the idea to put the 2 cards above came before trying out the deck and i can almost guarantee that they will be just terrible to include n this deck ..thanks for your reply man ^^)
-
looked at this deck today and started to really like it because it looks like a rogue arena draft ..and since rogues in arena are all about tempo i was curious about 2 cards that came to my mind as an inclusion but cant tell how much they can either affect the strategy of the deck or might be aiding it slightly ..the 2 cards are Undercity Valiant and Shado-Pan Rider . will appreciate some explanation if i was going to include any of the 2 cards and how they will affect the construction of the deck ..thanks in advance
-
PancakeMonk changed their profile photo
-
This (Y)
-
is it just me or this deck suffers alot against priests ?
-
thanks for the clarification ..but one thing i definitely want to try is to keep the force of nature and play it for more board than burst ..and for the silencing options spellbreaker is a good card ..for ooze and harrison i just dont like to run to many tech cards in a deck that has a specific strategy .ofc if the meta is all about warrior then its an auto include but u get my point hehe .. for the fel reavers am going with 1 ...maybe try to borrow some plays from the silence druid ..2 is alot and most of ur games 1 is enough to push for damage and keep your opponent busy for a couple of tu
-
is this deck still ladder viable because i really want to play it again ?
-
hey there kokuendan ..first of all the rank you achieve has nothing to do with how good you are in the game for many factors basically you would want to look at it like the following then evaluate 1- what deck are you mainly using on the ladder in which meta 2- time invested in reaching a specific rank 3-how your overall drawing quality was in all of your games you played through that period ..sometimes you are having rng on your side sometimes not ..but again its up to you to get the most out of you hand so dont be frustrated because the game is not that linear w
-
great post mate ..but still the thing that affects one statistical equation from another is the duplicates you have in your deck disregarding the curve and how the game stores the cards in your deck based on mana cost ..it would be cool if we can assemble a more basic mathematical approach to a specific archetype giving a rough probable outcome to drawing x card rather than making a basic reference to x deck ..i know this might take alot of time to invest in making a spread sheet with probabilities of outcomes from each archetype but am intrigued about the mathematical approach that might aid
-
hey kobal ..well most of the decks that are labeled as legend capable can achieve that here on the website ..the point is what meta will you be facing and what class/deck you are comfortable with ..zoo and hunters have always been a good way to skip the first 10 ranks ..i dont play rush or aggro but that might work for you ..as far as deck viability and card potency ..paladins with midrange builds have some sick play's on curve so if you are into some slower builds but certainly powerful go with the paly midrange builds ..budget or the full version are not far in terms of power ..to add to
-
yes the deck is indeed c;unky ..thats why i was assertive that i was a fluke .. i ended up finishing the priest quest with5 wins and 4 losses lol ..and its defiantly not a deck to consider for laddering it was something i wanted to try and will see the cards you mentioned and try to combine them in the same deck ..thanks man
-
hey there guys , after the last season ended i decided i want to play some casual games for the sake of fun and decided to make a deck for a class i dont play much ..in this case it was the priest and went to make a hybrid (c'thun and dragons) i tried it out today and won 3 games out of 3 urmm 1 priest and the same n'zoth rogue twice lol ..fluke 100% ofc ..i want some opinions on some better cards to fit in since the deck is way clunky but i like the idea that you are always finding synergy or buffing c'thun . here is the deck and i hope by time i can make it run better with your suggesti
-
i think control warrior is favored against zoolocks. i did not play alot on the wild ladder this season so i dont know how the meta is going but i guess its still a fast way to climb the ladder so i hopethe deck is still as strong as it was pre-wotog
-
boom zoo with the deathrattle minions and imp-losion is still one of my top choices on the wild ladder
-
freeze is still viable on both formats ...on standard you lose some cards but in return opponents have built decks that are usually midrange,control and ofc the miracle variations .i checked 2 days ago on the meta snapshot and it was stated that the deck only lost its hight place in tier 1 due too the presence of prominent warrior decks specially control but other than that its still and will always be a really good competitive deck so yeah ..see what kind of meta you are facing on each format and decide which will be more comfortable for you but in terms of the deck its always viable !!!
